some image logo

HOME

SEARCH

CURRENT ISSUE

REGULAR ISSUES

   Volume 1 (2005)

   Volume 2 (2006)

   Volume 3 (2007)

   Volume 4 (2008)

      Issue 1

      Issue 2

      Issue 3

      Issue 4

   Volume 5 (2009)

   Volume 6 (2010)

   Volume 7 (2011)

   Volume 8 (2012)

   Volume 9 (2013)

   Volume 10 (2014)

   Volume 11 (2015)

   Volume 12 (2016)

   Volume 13 (2017)

SPECIAL ISSUES

SURVEY ARTICLES

AUTHORS

ABOUT

SERVICE

LOGIN

FAQ

SUPPORT

CONTACT

VOLUME 4, ISSUE 1, PAPER 1


Are there Hilbert-style Pure Type Systems?

©Martin W. Bunder, University of Wollongong
©Wil J.M. Dekkers, Radboud University Nijmegen

Abstract
For many a natural deduction style logic there is a Hilbert-style logic that is equivalent to it in that it has the same theorems (i.e. valid judgements with empty contexts). For intuitionistic logic, the axioms of the equivalent Hilbert-style logic can be propositions which are also known as the types of the combinators I, K and S. Hilbert-style versions of illative combinatory logic have formulations with axioms that are actual type statements for I, K and S. As pure type systems (PTSs)are, in a sense, equivalent to systems of illative combinatory logic, it might be thought that Hilbert-style PTSs (HPTSs) could be based in a similar way. This paper shows that some PTSs have very trivial equivalent HPTSs, with only the axioms as theorems and that for many PTSs no equivalent HPTS can exist. Most commonly used PTSs belong to these two classes. For some PTSs however, including lambda* and the PTS at the basis of the proof assistant Coq, there is a nontrivial equivalent HPTS, with axioms that are type statements for I, K and S.

Publication date: January 7, 2008

Full Text: PDF | PostScript
DOI: 10.2168/LMCS-4(1:1)2008

Hit Counts: 8088

Creative Commons